COMPENDIUM CULTURAL POLICIES AND TRENDS IN EUROPE
Print this Page
EN DE FR  ||  About Us | Contact | Legal Notice Council of Europe LOGO  ERICarts LOGO
Print this Page
EN DE FR  Council of Europe LOGO  ERICarts LOGO

Italy/ 6. Financing of culture  

6.1 Short overview

As in most industrialised countries, the economics of culture in Italy follows a mixed economy model (see chapter 2.1), in which both the public and the private sectors share responsibility for the financing of cultural goods and activities. However, the public / private mix of financial resources significantly changed over the years.

Public expenditure - allocated by four levels of government: the state, the regions, the provinces, the municipalities - has traditionally been the primary source of support for heritage, archives and libraries, and an important one for the live performing arts (music, theatre, etc.). On the other hand the cultural industries - book publishing, the press, cinema and the audiovisuals - are mainly supported by the private sector through the marketplace: that is household expenditure for cultural goods and services, with the addition of advertising for radio television and the press. However, the boundaries between what the public and private sectors respectively fund have become more porous in the last decades: cinema, and the press have actually been heavily subsidised by government, due to problems of "market failure", whereas, since the 1980s, sponsorship and donations have become a more relevant source of support for heritage and museums.

The lack of comprehensive and exhaustive data on public and private expenditure for culture collected on a regular basis has always represented a "black hole" in our cultural information system, hampering the establishing of better synergies among different funding sources, so badly needed in times of financial constraint. In fact, unlike in other European countries, where ministries for culture (France, Spain…) or national statistical institutes (Germany, Sweden…) are responsible for regularly collecting data at least for the comprehensive government expenditure at all levels and from all the ministries and administrative units involved, in Italy, until recent times, such data have been only extemporaneously collected by public or private research organisations. The last comprehensive data were elaborated for the year 2000 by AEC's Rapporto sull'economia della cultura in Italia 1990-2000, whereas more recent data mainly focused on government financing of the cultural industries can be found in Fondazione Rosselli's XIII Rapporto sull'economia dei media.

It should be added that, for the time being, comparability even among countries regularly collecting statistics on public cultural financing cannot be reliably achieved, as stated in 2004 by the Task Force on Cultural Financing and subsequently confirmed by the Essnet Task Force on Financing and Expenditure. Comparability is hindered first and foremost by a lack of a common and sufficiently detailed definition of culture; furthermore, as it happens in Italy also, several countries do not provide regular information on cultural expenditure either by ministries other than the ministry of culture, or by the lower levels of government. Statistics on public cultural expenditure are still lacking in Eurostat's latest handbook Culture in Europe 2011.

Real progress in the international comparison of such statistics would probably require the adoption of a common taxonomy, like the UN classifications NACE (for economic activities) and ISCO (for professions). The good news is that, since 2014, the only existing UN classification on public expenditure – the COFOG (Classification of the Functions of Government), already collected by all EU countries at one digit level (8. Recreation, culture and religion) – is compulsorily collected at a two digit level. This will finally allow a step forward in international comparisons, at least as far as consolidated (net) overallgovernmentexpenditure for culture and the cultural industries is concerned, by singling out and summing up – within digit 8 – 8.2 Cultural services and 8.3 Broadcasting and publishing services.

As Istat has been collecting COFOG data at two digits level since 2008, we are allowed to define, on a yearly basis, at least the total amount of state and local public expenditure for culture starting from 2001 (see the following chapter 6.2.1 and chapter 6.2.2).


Chapter published: 15-07-2016

Your Comments on this Chapter?