Print this Page
EN DE FR  ||  Login / Register |  About Us | Contact | Legal Notice  

Hungary/ 6.2 Public cultural expenditure  

6.2.3 Sector breakdown

Table 8:    State cultural expenditure by sector, by level of government, in HUF, in 2009

Field / Domain /
Sub-domain

Central
government

Regional
and local

Total public
expenditure

Million
HUF

(%)

Million HUF

(%)

Million HUF

(%)

Cultural Goods

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cultural Heritage

 

 

 

 

 

 

Museums

15 270 

32.70% 

13 516 

12.97% 

28 786 

19.07% 

Archives

1 947

4.17%

4 762

4.57%

6 709

4.45%

Libraries

9 914

21.23%

21 047

20.20%

30 961

20.52%

Arts

  

  

  

  

  

  

Performing Arts

 

 

 

 

 

 

Music

7 504 

16.07% 

3 617 

3.47% 

11 121 

7.37% 

Theatre and Musical Theatre

932 

2.00% 

28 328 

27.18% 

29 260 

19.39% 

Dance

483 

1.03% 

452 

0.43% 

935 

0.62% 

Other arts

679

1.45%

879

0.84%

1 558

1.03%

Media

  

  

  

  

  

  

Books and Press

 

 

 

 

 

 

Books

 

 

  

  

 

 

Press

 

 

 

 

Audio, Audiovisual
and Multimedia

-

-

 

 

 

 

Radio

 

 

 

 

 

 

Television

-

-

 

 

 

 

Other

-

-

 

 

 

 

Socio-cultural

 

 

28 332

27.19%

28 332

18.77%

Educational activities

 

 

 

 

 

 

Not allocable by domain

9 975

21.36%

3 280

3.15%

13 255

8.78%

TOTAL

46 704

100.0%

104 213

100.0%

150 917

100.00%

Source:    Hungarian State Treasury.

The major part of socio-cultural activities is constituted by the operations of the community cultural centre whose functions include various forms of informal and adult education. Since the Treasury combines all forms of out-of-school education, one fourth of it was included in the socio-cultural category, which is the largest item even without this addition.

Although the central budget contains large amounts of subsidies to the public media (in 2007, 7 500 million HUF, ca. EUR 30 million), the spending of these is not identified in the tables of the Treasury. The cultural items in the budget of the Ministry of Education and Culture are on the whole higher (in 2007 exceeding HUF 60 million) than what the treasury records as cultural spending. Among further ambivalences of the records of the Treasury is the fact that construction and re-construction of buildings is taken together, without the possibility of identifying those done in the cultural sector.

On the other hand it is an advantage that the State Treasury has been applying the same system for years. Thus we can conclude that regional and local cultural expenditure keeps increasing at the cost of the central governmental budget. The latter stood at 29.5% two years earlier (compared to 23.6% in 2007). Actual difference is in fact smaller than that: at least a tenth of the spending of the local governments is subsidised from the budget of the central government. This, however, is recorded as local expenditure in order to avoid cumulating errors (reporting the same spending at both levels). The largest item of such indirect central funding is the one spent on municipal and regional theatres.

Regardless of the methodological complexities, the continued marked trend of decentralisation is clearly visible.


Chapter published: 20-11-2012

Your Comments on this Chapter?




 

              Council of Europe/ERICarts, "Compendium of Cultural Policies and Trends in Europe, 14th edition", 2013 | ISSN 2222-7334