COMPENDIUM CULTURAL POLICIES AND TRENDS IN EUROPE
Print this Page
EN DE FR  ||  About Us | Contact | Legal Notice Council of Europe LOGO  ERICarts LOGO
Print this Page
EN DE FR  Council of Europe LOGO  ERICarts LOGO
 

A new Strategic Plan of the Ministry of Culture for 2014-2016 was adopted in December 2013.

 

The lowering of income tax in 2015 will impact on local budgets which are dependent on this tax.

Show all Profile-News...

Croatia/ 2. General objectives and principles of cultural policy  

2.1 Main features of the current cultural policy model

See also chapter 3.2 for a description of the cultural policy system, including Cultural Councils and  chapter 4.1 for the list of cultural policy priorities.

The general objectives of cultural policy in the last two decades have included the pursuance of values such as: cultural pluralism (aesthetic and multiethnic), creative autonomy, the increase and diversification of sources for financing culture, polycentric cultural development, encouraging cultural participation and co-operation between the public and the private sector to increase efficiency, quality, employment and innovation. The most ambitious goal is bringing culture into the focus of interest of all inhabitants of the country. The "Strategy of Cultural Development – Croatia in the 21st Century", drawn up in co-operation between the Ministry of Culture and a team of independent experts and accepted in the Croatian Parliament in early 2002, gives a detailed presentation of these goals and the necessary instruments to achieve them. One of the key goals of the Cultural Development Strategy has been the democratisation of culture, intended to increase active participation in culture and to popularise art and culture in schools and through the media. However, since then no action plans were made in order to implement the adopted strategy.

Strategy of Protection, Conservation and Sustainable Economic Utilisation of Cultural Heritage of the Republic of Croatia (2011-2015) was adopted in July 2011. (For more information see chapter 4.2.2). The revised Strategic Plan of the Ministry of Culture for the period 2015-2017 was adopted in 2014 with some new goals elaborated with further stress on the development of cultural and artistic creativity and production on the one side, and on the protection of cultural heritage on the other (For more information see chapter 4.1).

Decentralisation is still an important subject of debate in Croatian cultural policy and practice, and has been highlighted in the Programme of the former government. However, no significant changes regarding decentralisation have been made during former or current governments. This process was further slowed down due to the lowering of income tax in 2015 which is primary source of income for local government that further influenced the decrease of funding for local government. There has been a continuous pressure on the central government to enable fiscal decentralisation, which is a necessary precondition for any other efforts in this direction (decentralisation of education, health, etc.). The model of cultural decentralisation still awaits public debate, revision, and an eventual possibility to be gradually implemented. Until recently cultural strategies on the local level were scarcely adopted; the only exception was the "Istrian Cultural Strategy" of the Istra County that was adopted in Poreč in 2009. However, in the last couple of years, selected cities have adopted them (e.g. Rijeka, Zadar, Varaždin, Osijek, Dubrovnik). This mainly can be attributed to the preparation of these cities for application to European Capital of Culture programme that obliges cities to have such strategies. Amendments to the Law on Cultural Councils in 2013 opened up the possibility of cities (or other municipalities) with more than 20 000 inhabitants to establish cultural councils. Further discussion on decentralisation and new territorial organisation of the Republic of Croatia will be very much influenced by the regional development strategies driven by the EU standards and priorities including NUTS regions as well as by announced changes of the tax system.

The process of decentralisation is also supported through the provisions in the Law on the Protection and Preservation of Cultural Assets (NN 69/99, NN 151/03; NN 157/03, Amend., NN 87/09, NN 88/10, NN 61/11, NN 25/12, NN 136/12, NN 157/13, NN 152/14, NN 98/15)which regulates the distribution of funds collected through the "monument annuity" fund and establishes the Registry of Cultural Assets. This Law ensures that 60% of the funds collected are used by the local governments in their respective city / municipality for the protection of cultural heritage. With the financial crisis and the changes in the legislation defining revenues from the monument annuity, the amount of funds collected through this scheme is decreasing, which is limiting the ability of local communities to invest in cultural heritage restoration.


Chapter published: 04-05-2017

Your Comments on this Chapter?